Contamination risk

SLS / SLES and 1,4-Dioxane Contamination

HIGH SEVERITY 1,4-DIOXANE: NTP REASONABLY ANTICIPATED HUMAN CARCINOGEN; NEW YORK LIMITS 2 PPM IN PERSONAL CARE (2023)

1,4-dioxane is an unintentional byproduct of ethoxylation in SLES, PEG, polysorbates, and ceteareth ingredients. NTP lists as reasonably anticipated human carcinogen. New York caps levels at 2 ppm.

What you need to know

1,4-Dioxane is an industrial contaminant that appears unintentionally in personal care and cosmetic products as a byproduct of a chemical process called ethoxylation. This process is used to create milder, foaming ingredients like sodium laureth sulfate (SLES), polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbates, and ceteareth compounds commonly found in shampoos, body washes, cleansers, and moisturizers. Unlike intentional additives, 1,4-dioxane is not listed on product labels because manufacturers do not add it deliberately; it forms during ingredient manufacturing and may remain as a trace contaminant in the final product. The health concern centers on 1,4-dioxane's classification as a reasonably anticipated human carcinogen by the National Toxicology Program (NTP). The FDA acknowledges that 1,4-dioxane can be present in cosmetics and notes that while exposure through cosmetic use is generally considered low-risk due to limited skin penetration and infrequent ingestion, the agency continues to monitor levels in marketed products. The primary exposure route of concern is inhalation during product use and potential dermal absorption, particularly with products that remain on skin or are used repeatedly over time. Regulatory approaches vary significantly across jurisdictions. In the United States, the FDA does not prohibit 1,4-dioxane in cosmetics but recommends that manufacturers use processes to minimize contamination. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates 1,4-dioxane as a hazardous air pollutant and groundwater contaminant. Most notably, New York State implemented a limit of 2 parts per million (ppm) of 1,4-dioxane in personal care products, effective 2023, making it the first U.S. state to establish a specific numerical limit. The European Union has not established a specific limit for 1,4-dioxane in cosmetics, though the EU Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) has reviewed the substance. California has not yet adopted a specific ppm cap, though the state monitors the issue through its Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). Consumers seeking to minimize exposure have several practical options. While 1,4-dioxane cannot be identified on ingredient labels, shoppers can reduce potential exposure by choosing products formulated without ethoxylated ingredients—look for the absence of SLES, PEG, polysorbates, and ceteareth compounds on the ingredient list. Simpler formulations using non-ethoxylated surfactants such as sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS, which does not require ethoxylation), plant-derived cleansers like sodium cocoyl isethionate, or solid cleansing bars eliminate the contamination pathway entirely. Brands that voluntarily test for and limit 1,4-dioxane to levels below 2 ppm may provide additional assurance. Reading third-party certifications from organizations that screen for contaminants, such as those verified by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), can also help identify products with lower contamination profiles. For consumers in New York, state compliance ensures that personal care products meet the 2 ppm threshold.

Primary sources (4)
  1. ntp.niehs.nih.gov
  2. fda.gov
  3. dec.ny.gov
  4. ewg.org

No implicated brands on record

We only list brands once we have a primary-source link tying them to this issue. Nothing on file yet.