Mineral Oil and Petrolatum
Petroleum-derived emollients. Cosmetic-grade is USP/BP refined and considered low-risk by mainstream regulators, but EU restricts unrefined grades over PAH residue concerns. EWG flags supply-chain transparency rather than the refined ingredient itself.
Mineral oil and petrolatum are petroleum-derived emollients widely used in cosmetics, skincare products, and personal care items to soften and protect skin. Both substances are refined from crude oil and serve as occlusive moisturizers that form a barrier on the skin's surface. While these ingredients have been used safely in consumer products for decades, questions about their origin, refining process, and potential contaminants have made them subjects of ongoing scrutiny among consumers and advocacy groups seeking greater transparency in cosmetic supply chains. The primary health concern associated with mineral oil and petrolatum centers not on the refined ingredients themselves, but on potential residual contaminants, particularly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which can remain in unrefined or poorly refined grades. The FDA permits cosmetic-grade mineral oil that meets United States Pharmacopeia (USP) or British Pharmacopoeia (BP) standards, considering these refined versions to be low-risk for consumer use. However, the European Union has taken a more restrictive stance, prohibiting untreated and mildly treated petrolatum in cosmetics due to concerns about PAH residues. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) does not flag refined mineral oil or petrolatum as inherently hazardous substances; instead, EWG emphasizes the importance of supply-chain transparency and manufacturer accountability in ensuring that only properly refined grades reach consumers. Regulatory frameworks differ notably between regions. In the United States, the FDA oversees mineral oil products and permits cosmetic-grade versions meeting USP standards without restriction. The European Union's approach is more precautionary, with the European Commission's COSING database listing petrolatum with restrictions on treatment level, reflecting the EU's stricter stance on PAH contamination risks. This divergence reflects different regulatory philosophies: the US system focuses on the refined end product, while the EU emphasizes process controls and raw material quality. Individual US states, including California, have not implemented separate bans on these ingredients, though California's Proposition 65 program continues to monitor petroleum-derived substances for potential listing. For consumers seeking to make informed choices, label transparency is key. Look for products that specify "cosmetic-grade" or "USP/BP mineral oil" or "petrolatum," which indicates the manufacturer has used refined versions meeting international standards. If supply-chain transparency is a personal priority, consider contacting brands directly to ask about their sourcing and refining processes. Alternatives to mineral oil and petrolatum include plant-based emollients such as jojoba oil, coconut oil, shea butter, and squalane, as well as synthetic alternatives like dimethicone. However, these alternatives vary in efficacy, cost, and environmental footprint, so the "best" choice depends on individual skin type, values, and product performance needs. Neither mineral oil nor petrolatum is banned in major markets, and refined versions are considered safe by mainstream regulators; the choice to avoid them is primarily a matter of personal preference regarding ingredient sourcing and brand transparency practices.
No implicated brands on record
We only list brands once we have a primary-source link tying them to this issue. Nothing on file yet.